While helping Earth Day Network to prepare its programming ahead of the 2012 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, I took a look back at the most famous “Earth Summit”-The 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development. However, when I typed “Earth Summit” into the search box at YouTube, I got some startling results.
The first hit, with nearly 400,000 views, is an inspiring speech given at the 1992 summit by a young girl named Severn Suzuki.
Severn Suzuki Speaking at 1992 Earth Summit
The video is posted in multiple languages and under multiple titles (”Girl Who Silenced the UN for 5 Minutes“) which, if aggregated, total several million views! Watching this young leader brimming with promise advocate for the unheard voices of her generation, you might conclude that the 1992 Summit was a moving week of high-minded oratory, where the world’s leaders instantaneously realized that our economic growth needed a greater degree of sustainability. And, in a sense, it was.
The next few videos, however, would likely confuse you. Many of them include interviews with a man named George Hunt-several even recorded prior to the Summit. Hunt claimed, back in the early 1990s, that the environmental movement had been hijacked by the “elites” of the world to usher in a New World Order. The fodder for his speculation included a few ghastly puns, delivered in a vaguely-ominous monotone.
“The acronym UNCED … is pronounced ‘unsaid,’ perhaps indicating the secret agenda of this meeting,” Hunt says.
As Hunt goes on to denounce Maurice Strong, the Canadian businessman appointed Secretary General for the 1992 Summit, you might think that Hunt’s ideas belonged to a sector of the right-wing fringe lost to history. In fact, Hunt’s ideas were revived by the always entertaining Glenn Beck in May of this year. [Strong has repeatedly rebutted these scurrilous accusations, perhaps unnecessarily]
Looking toward the future, Rio +20 could be remembered for any number of things. Perhaps the governments of the world will announce a series of individual efforts aimed at improving their record on sustainable development. Perhaps it will take the interest of youth worldwide in environmental issues and catalyze it into action. Perhaps it will simply fail.
Today, the onus is on the environmental movement to define the goals of the 2012 Summit long before opponents of “environmental progress” can get their hands on it. We must begin to state our hopes and objectives, to ensure that the true history of this summit is not overwhelmed by gross speculation and conspiracy theories. With a coordinated effort, we can make the global public aware of this fast-approaching opportunity for change. With luck, we can make it into an incontrovertible success story.